Discuss allocation and make issue tracker tasks for prototype work.
Discuss milestones, deadlines.
Generate list of priorities for what we want our solution to achieve
Discussion items
Item
Who
Notes
Priorities (what problems are we solving?)
All
Speed: speed is a feature. Predictably say how long some ingest will take.
Allowing recovery from failure; pick up where it left off. Speed affects this; if it's fast enough you don't have to worry about it. Otherwise, make sure there's recovery. Harvesters should allow recovery, where possible. Indexers could also be less speedy than mappings and enrichments, and may deserve recovery features.
Adding automation that was originally specified: have a program that shepherds the process all the way through. Scheduling.
Eventually, provide a useable mapping DSL
Needs real market research
This is not a turnkey solution yet. Some things like DSLs will be evaluated later when we can more confident in understanding how big the user base is.
Writing mappings ourselves in the third system without a DSL will allow us to understand the problem space better.
Ability to debug things, especially mappings
Code examples
Michael et. al.
Got walkthroughs of the Python, Python + Spark, Java, and Scala prototypes
Staff allocation for necessary professional development
Mental "context switching" with multiple environments
Server cost, if having to run more servers (consider execution speed memory usage if able to run on just one node, e.g.)
Performance
Ease of use for novice / non-programmer
Ease of writing a DSL in it
Ability to be explicit in code (e.g. types). Fewer inferences, LESS MAGIC!
Ease of deployment. (local, production, dependencies)
How easy for other institutions to adopt our code or experiment with it.
Developer enjoyment
What scale will we be working in for the foreseeable future?
Ingestion total or by provider?
Extra pressure b/c we want to reinvest more frequently - that could mean 10 million records per month
Targets for 12-24 months (these are just proposals)
200 million records stored
15 million records per month
CDL is today’s edge case but it is not a future-proof case
LOC is ready to open the floodgates - maybe 20 million every couple months - 5,000 is only a test case
NARA - 3.8 million
Priorities
Writing harvests, mappings, and enrichments in a scalable system
We can grow into decisions about how to scale
Scheduling system
All
Scheduling / operation chaining / "Plans" in the Prov-O sense
Need metrics for what qualifies job failure. (Partly thought out)
Need to get together and assess our experiences running ingests.
If we automate things, we need to know how to define success.
Tools exist that can help with this.
Need to schedule a period after basic manual ingest running is figured out, but need to design for there being a scheduling facility. Per "General consensus" section below, we will design programs for each activity in the ingest process that have their concerns passed to them. They will not know anything about the scheduling system that calls them. They will not be bound to them with database models. They will save manifests that document the results of their operations.
Roadmapping all of this
All
Harvester development - At the end of next week (after language selection) we should vote to select which class of harvester we want to prototype
ResourceSync (harvesting DPLA's sitemap)
API
NARA
CDL
OAI-PMH
WI
Digital Commonwealth
General consensus on the project's design philosophy is to follow these principles: